Given the way the events of the war played out, there was no other foreseeable outcome other than her defeat. We all know how the war turned outwith an overwhelming Soviet-Western Allied victory over Nazi Germany ending with the destruction of Germany and the death by starvation of millions of its citizens. 2 US taking on Japan and preventing them from attacking anyone else isan important contribution, but especially in the light of #1, it doesnt seem to be critical. When landings become inevitable, he diverts the landings to Italy, calling it soft underbelly of Axis. This gave Poland the footing it needed to refuse all of Hitlers subsequent attempts to negotiate the return of this Polish occupied German city. The same applies to their contribution in forcing the Germans to leave most heavy artillery in the Reich as anti-aircraft weapons, preventing them from being used as anti-tank weapons in the East. This would have slowed the growth of US armed forces once the entered the war in december 41 and probebly delayed overlord untill 1945. They're exposed to a German counter attack eastward from Munich or westward from Budapest, maybe both at the same time. This would have reduced investment in the US arms industry and thus slowed it growth or even caused plants to close. Allied advance in the West definitely took some heat off of Eastern Front, but as can be understood from the situation by the time of landings, Germans did not fear Western Front as they regarded Eastern Front. This proved crucial in the Blitzkrieg against the Low Countries and France. Unless you can refute the other scenarios for Allied victory before 1941 then the answer to the OPs question remains yes. Of course, we are not taking tactical considerations into account. ", Nikolai Ryzhkov, the last head of the government of the Soviet Union, wrote in 2015 that "it can be confidently stated that [Lend-Lease assistance] did not play a decisive role in the Great Victory.". Relatives and friends have buried children and others killed in a Russian missile attack on the central Ukrainian city of Uman. In contrast, people in Eastern Front were ordered to die where they stood. Lend Lease for USSR was important in non-combat equipment radios, trucks and similar. By September 1944, we see Allies only coming to German border: The disproportionate advance of Allies in Western Front in the late stages of the war compared to the advance in Eastern Front after this point is due to German staff trying to prevent a Soviet takeover of entire Germany, and preferring an occupation by the other Allies. WebTo give an idea: IIRC, just before Japan's defeat, in one year the United States pumped out as much material as Japan did over the course of the war. The additional firepower, resources, and soldiers of the U.S. helped to tip the balance of the war in favor of the Allies. Russian Federation Soviet Union on politics, society, foreign policy, philosophy and tech. Not to mention the "scorched earth" strategy which had already taken it's toll on the Germans. This included such small arms as the MG34, MG42 and the world's first "assault rifle," the StG44. The effect of such a negotiated settlement might have been a long-term peace for Europe, (with the exception of Hitlers plan to invade the Soviet Union of course), likely transforming both Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy into mostly satisfied, rather than revisionist, powers generally supportive of maintaining the British-led world order. The result would have been an eastern block streching to the atlantic and a much weaker post war US. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. Therefore they would still have to keep some forces there even if they could reduce them much more. Stalin was of the same opinion but naturally did not admit it publicly. The fact that the US never hit production capacity in ww2 is just insane. Most Russians believe the Soviet military would have been able to win World War II without the efforts of the U.S. or its allies, a Defeat never came down to one battle or one campaign. It was really the only time Nazi Germany had actually declared war on an enemy, and it needed not to have happened. Roosevelt also contributed to Soviet stabilization. He rapidly began to simplify construction procedures for the T-34 and within less than a year the number of man-hours required to produce T-34s was cut in half. The Joint Chiefs of Staff anticipated trouble with Churchill. Faced with these realities and incensed by the attack on Pearl Harbor, everyday Americans enthusiastically supported the war effort. As noted, it dragged the Germans into campaigns that were unnecessary including in Greece and North Africa, and then when Benito Mussolini's government was toppled Germany was forced to occupy its former ally. The First World War saw two factions of "great powers" square off. He believed that a war with Russia would lead to the downfall of both empires.. Germany's defeat came about from a number of much larger factors. The entry of the United States was the turning point of the war, because it made the eventual defeat of Germany possible. If there had been no lend-lease, then the UK would have lost the war. The impact of the United States joining the war was significant. ), and France. WebGermany and Italy Japans alliesresponded by declaring war against the United States. Did the Allies win ww1 because of the US? All the while Indian colonial troops in India are still there, and many Chinese factions now encouraged with lessened Japanese forces in China. But it cannot be denied that the Americans sent us materiel without which we could not have formed our reserves or continued the war. Sorry Soviet and British Nationalists: the USA economic, industrial and operational/tactical contributions were key: You know, that's the crux of the problem in all these discussions: practically. These freed up Soviet resources to concentrate on combat vehicle production. WebFor the Allies in World War Two, the defeat of Germany was their priority. Some of the add-ons on this site are powered by. Perhaps my original question should have been "What would have happened in WWII if there had been no Spam?". This particular C-47 was sent to the Far North and spent the war conducting reconnaissance and weather-monitoring missions over the Kara Sea. All rights reserved. We had lost our grain-producing areas". In addition, much of the $31 billion worth of aid sent to the United Kingdom was also passed on to the Soviet Union via convoys through the Barents Sea to Murmansk. ww1 - the British had mastered combined arms warfare and the Allies would have won but been willing to cut a less one-sided deal to bring it to an end. On March 12, 1943, the plane was given to the Soviet Air Force in Fairbanks, Alaska, and given the registration USSR-N238. I assume that since Overlord hasn't happened that most or at least many of the German troops garrisoning France are available to be redeployed to Munich, Budapest, or anywhere else the Germans care to send them. Though this indeed tied some German forces, the forces were not anything which could be compared to what was being thrown to Eastern Front, with one notable panzer group being stationed ner Pas de Calais (Hitlers folly), and most of the preparation taking the form of elaborate fortifications that were called Atlantic Wall prepared mainly by Rommel. Red Army tank officers were not impressed with the 2-pounder (40mm) gun on the Matilda and Valentines, nor their poor cross-country mobility, but their 6075mm-thick armour was impervious to German 3.7cm and 5cm anti-tank weapons. If in a worse scenario the Soviets would have lost Leningrad or the Kavkaz oil fields, or maybe even Moscow, they would just move their government, army, factories and supplies to Siberia. British-built armour plate also had a much higher nickel content 3 per cent versus 1 per cent for Russian-made steel which reduced the risk of armour spalling (i.e. Across Northern France, Belgium, the Netherlands, and into Northern Germany, 21st Army Group advanced on a front about 75 miles wide. Nevertheless, British Lend-Lease tanks helped the Red Army to restock its tank units until domestic production could catch up and are estimated to have comprised about 10 per cent of the tanks defending Moscow in NovemberDecember 1941. Most Russians believe the Soviet military would have been able to win World War II without the efforts of the U.S. or its allies, a new poll finds. In addition, almost half of all the rails used by the Soviet Union during the war came through Lend-Lease. That proved to be fairly well matched against Russia, France, and Great Britain at least in the early stages of the war. After this proposal was rejected by the Poles, he could have demanded the return of merely Danzig and the Polish Corridor perhaps with some of the same assurances to the Poles offered by the German delegation at Versailles in 1919, namely to allow the Poles a road/rail corridor to the German port of Danzig just as he offered Poland in real life. Would The Allies Have Won Ww1 Without America? Churchill would have been ousted by a pragmatist, perhaps RAB Butler or Sir John Simon who would have sought peace with Hitler in exchange for some degree of self determination, which would in effect have counted for little. 'We Would Have Lost': Did U.S. Lend-Lease Aid Tip The Balance In Soviet Fight Against Nazi Germany? The body of the captain, Maksim Tyurikov, was found by local hunters about 120 kilometers from the wreck in 1953. We cannot measure the distance of the Soviet economy from the point of collapse in 1942, but it seems beyond doubt that collapse was near. WebIn 1963, KGB monitoring recorded Soviet Marshal Georgy Zhukov saying: "People say that the allies didn't help us. As we celebrate the ending of the war 75 years ago, know this: victory for the Allies was never guaranteed, and historians agree there were countless ways Germany could have won the war. W. Without the need to fight in the Atlantic; to transport large amounts of troops, equipment, and supplies across the entire continent; and the necessity to defend against Allied bombing, Germany could have massively reduced its U-boat, locomotive, and anti-aircraft gun and ammunition production and converted at least part of these capacities into the production of more aircraft and equipment for land warfare. Neither the Allied Powers (France, Britain, Russia, Italy, Japan, and several smaller states) nor the Central Powers (Germany, Austria-Hungary, the Ottoman Empire, and Bulgaria) would have gained everything they wanted from a negotiated settlement. Despite the self-professed role of the US as the guardian of freedom, democracy, human rights and the world order, and the huge sums of money it spends on its military, it has never led a successful campaign to achieve the goals it set for itself. Germany had to deal with resistance and partisan efforts, and as the tide of war turned its "allies" left the fight. The problem is the flanks. metal splinters inside the tank) when the tank was hit by non-penetrating rounds.137 Although designed as infantry support tanks and employed in that role by the Red Army, the 2-pounder gun did not have an HE round, which reduced the value of the tanks in that role. Im not sure if Germany would have won but they might have ended up with more favorable terms or even just went back to their original borders. the first thing to point out is that those who think the UK would have colapsed and been invaded are just wrong. Many experts have considered the US impossible to invade because of its major industries, reliable and fast supply lines, large geographical size, geographic location, population size, and difficult regional features. A Japanese attack on the Soviet Union, on the other hand, would have put Josef Stalin in the very difficult situation of also fighting a two-front war. Our tank production was lower than Germany's and the quality was appalling. The German Army was practically at the gates of Moscow in late 1941. War of 1812. There is one World War II historian, John Lukacs, who has said that all three major allies were needed to beat Hitler. My object was to cheer up Harry and give him my ideas as to how he was to hold the president in line if he couldI have no doubt of the British people doing it. WebWe would like to show you a description here but the site wont allow us. The others were never found. Germany's defeat came about from a number of much larger factors. British Matilda tanks are loaded onto a ship for transportation to the U.S.S.R. as part of the Lend-Lease program. However, the overall 71 exchange ratio between Soviet and German tank losses was inconsistent with the Red Army gaining any kind of superiority over the Wehrmachts panzer forces. When World War II started, America was isolationist and the Soviet Union collaborationist. Then there is the fact that Germany lacked the winter clothing for its Army during that first terrible Soviet winter. Such assessments, however, are contradicted by the opinions of Soviet war participants. The Allies likely would have followed suit by making peace with Nazi Germany, too, thus ending World War II after a mere two weeks of fighting. Sure but this not what the OP specified so the answer remains yes the Allies could win without direct US involvement or even with the pre Lend-Lease levels of support if it happens early in the war. WebThe Big Three. The only viable route seems to be towards the West from Northern Italy, from a narrow region towards France. Indeed, Polish leaders feared that had Hitler done this, then Britain and France would never have declared war on Germany. Thus, landings in 1944 came at a point at which Soviets broke German armies and were racing towards Berlin. Much contention. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. Inevitably so, since British were still in the war, and even though British and Canadians were frustrated in a grand fashion when they attempted a landing inDieppe Raidto test German defenses in regard to a possible landing, the risk of a potential landing was still there. Would The Allies Have Won Ww2 Without Russia? It may not display this or other websites correctly. A map of lend-lease shipments from the United States to the U.S.S.R. from 1941-45. "One-on-one against Hitler's Germany, we would not have withstood its onslaught and would have lost the war.

Stockton Borough Council, Articles W